Seek thermal shotpro vs flir c5 full#
Seek thermal shotpro vs flir c5 pro#

Seek thermal shotpro vs flir c5 pro#

The shutter rapidly act 2-3 times on power down, this is a new bug not existing on Pro version. The dynamic range is worse? A clear sky shows around -30C on Pro model, while on non-Pro it max out at -40C. This is according to one of my friend owning a early Compact, I’m looking forward to compare them soon. The image quality is seemingly good, not that much worse than the Pro version, and much better than the first generation Compact. The Pro version’s visible camera is also high frame rate, but lags a lot. Maybe because there are less data per frame to process. The frame rate is significantly higher, and the lag is also shorter. Maybe because the non-pro version have a smaller sensor, thus the thermal capacity is lower. However, this makes more sense on non-pro version because image does look better after each shutter event when just turn on. Buy Seek Thermal - Shotpro - Handheld Thermal Imaging Camera and Sensor online on Amazon.ae at best prices. From turn on, 1.5 seconds interval for 4-5 times, then 5.5 seconds interval until 3 minutes from power up, then 9.5 seconds interval for more than 10 minutes (maybe forever?) Add: The interval changed to 14.5 seconds after 13-21 minutes(I didn’t catch the exact time) from power on, then remain unchanged during the whole 1 hour test. The FFC/NUC have slightly different timing, but similarly aggressive. I mentioned the bug in my older thread with a sample video, when you draw a big area box on Pro version, the lens-correction will rapidly toggle between enabled and disabled mode. The lens correction effect is much lower than the Pro version, and the area measure mode bug doesn’t exist.

Seek thermal shotpro vs flir c5 full#

Also, the visible light camera are exact the same, because I can extract the full wide angle image in SeekView App (due to a bug I believe). Maybe they do use the same lens, so they have the same iFOV. Conclusion: Detecting and revealing the inhomogeneous temperature distribution on the injured toe of the subject, we, in this paper, analyzed the imaging results of two. After I messed with the Seek Shot Pro, I got a non-pro version, here are some interesting points compared to the Pro version: The thermal lens looks identical between them. However, the thermal images of FLIR One are noisier than SEEK Compact PRO since the thermal resolution of FLIR One is 160 × 120 while it is 320 × 240 in SEEK Compact PRO.